The company World Wide Metric has a comprehensive and easy to use conversion webpage. One of the most interesting things about traveling is observing and learning about cultural differences that make countries unique. Even better, participating in an American internship allows you to do this while simultaneously furthering your career! He received a Master of Science in Global Affairs from New York University, and worked with the State Department and two New York organizations with missions to introduce young people to multiculturalism and international relations.
He is excited to leverage this experience with InterExchange! Career Training USA is a cultural exchange program that enables current university students and young professionals from all over the world to pursue internships in the U.
Read about the adventures others have had and get excited for yours. Imperial vs. Metric System. Why Imperial and Not Metric? No need to break out the measuring tape - just read on! Then President Ronald Reagan, using public opposition to his advantage, dismantled the U. Metric Board in In France, it took decades and decades. According to Pearl and many others, though, the U.
NASA specified metric units in the contract. NASA and other organizations worked in metric units, but one subcontractor, Lockheed Martin, provided thruster performance data to the team in pound force seconds instead of newton seconds.
The spacecraft was intended to orbit Mars at about kilometers altitude, but the incorrect data meant that it probably descended instead to about 57 kilometers, burning up in the thin Martian atmosphere. They hope that without tablespoons and teaspoons in play, parents will find it easier to dose correctly as prescribed in metric. This year, ECRI, a nonprofit that studies effective medical procedures and processes, ranked medical errors related to pounds and kilograms as No. ECRI now recommends that the U.
Even the 8. The rest of the world uses the metrically measured A4 paper. When it comes to education, the U. In recent years, a couple of states have attempted to take measurement into their own purview. Both the Institute for Safe Medication Practices and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are encouraging manufacturers and the pharmacies to use only the metric system on over-the-counter meds for these reasons.
But they aren't requirements, just suggestions. Another problem with a dual-measurement US is that some professions are speaking a different language than the rest of the culture. Experts regularly talk about the need for more qualified American workers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics STEM. But because metric isn't learned from birth, students must first learn a foreign language — the metric system — before they can learn science or engineering or become part of the medical community.
That's a barrier to entry that just shouldn't be there. Congress passed the Metric Conversion Act of at about the same time many other countries were also switching over. It created the United States Metric Board to educate people about the metric system and to coordinate a voluntary switchover. But that law had two key problems. Unlike the legislation that created a metric UK, Canada, or Australia, it was voluntary instead of mandated.
And it had no deadline for when the switch must be finished, which deflated the cause's urgency. Facing a fair amount of resistance from the public and without a congressional mandate that could force changes, the United States Metric Board simply couldn't do its job.
And so by , President Reagan had the board disbanded. Some amendments have been made to the act since, including one that declared metric "preferred" but not mandatory for trade and has encouraged many federal agencies to use the metric system today. But aside from double labeling on the packaging on food and other consumer goods since , requirements in the private sector have continued to be weak.
Congress could pass a new law with a hard mandate and a solid timeline to switch over. This is what the US Metric Association favors.
But there doesn't seem to be much interest in it from Congress right now. Another possibility is that companies and peop le slowly slide towa rd the metric system on their own — w ith lots of confusion along the way.
In this scenario, companies continue to adopt the system voluntarily, and state and federal regulations push metric at the margins. This is already happening to some extent — metric pops up in lots of places in the United States: t wo-liter bottles of soda , meter races.
Some e ntire industries, such as science and medicine, already use metric. But it could go further. That would increase consumer exposure, which might make voters more comfortable with mandatory metric laws. And there does seem to be some public support.
A petition to the White House for mandatory metric garnered more than 49, signatures and a response from the director of NIST, who reminded them of the current voluntary regulations and that everyone can choose to use metric if they want. The French realized this toward the end of the project. They were too far into it to make any corrections, if that had even been possible.
So they fudged things to establish what we now call the meter. The metric system is no more rational than any other system. A useful system requires only agreement on which standard to use. The French chose the one they liked, and as the book explains, were able after a good many years to persuade many other nations to use it.
The use of the decimal for the system is vastly overrated. It makes sense for money, but in a physical measurement it is much easier and far more accurate to divide by two by the eye, as the US Customary System allows, than it is by ten. This matters in almost every measurement most of us make. Let the scientists keep their decimals. The carpenter and the cook have a better system. Granted, it is inconvenient to have two measurement systems in the world, sometimes even deadly.
A plane crashed because of it, costing lives. The Mars Orbiter was lost because of it, costing hundreds of millions of dollars and the loss of important opportunities in science.
But it would be extremely difficult for the US to change to the metric system. It would cost an enormous amount of money and aggravation, and it is not necessary.
The one we are using is superior in many ways. Sorry, nerds. You might think you sound superior by using kilometers instead of miles, but you are just following the mindless herd. We should not start calling the inch worm the centimeter worm. This article implies we are not metric. We are. We use both. The question for decades isn't "why aren't we metric," but instead "why do we use both?
I have a year old house. It isn't metric. We didn't have to build infrastructure from scratch after WWII, so we have countless legacy systems in place.
0コメント